Should Companies Refrain From Making Political Statements?

MIT Sloan Management Review

A protester displays a placard during a rally in front of the Chinese Consulate in Manila's financial district on July 10, 2015, calling to boycott products made in China and denouncing China's claim to most of the South China Sea including areas claimed by the Philippines. The Philippines on July 7 appealed to an international tribunal to declare China's claims to most of the South China Sea illegal, warning the integrity of United Nations' maritime laws is at stake. China insists it has sovereign rights to nearly all of the South China Sea, a strategically vital waterway with shipping lanes through which about a third of all the world's traded oil passes. AFP PHOTO / Jay DIRECTO (Photo credit should read JAY DIRECTO/AFP via Getty Images)

May 31, 2023

MIT SMR Strategy Forum recently published an article featuring Timothy Simcoe, Professor of Strategy and Innovation, discussing whether companies should refrain from making political statements.

Two years ago, soccer organization UEFA attempted to opt out of taking a political stance — a decision that was itself decried as a political statement. In an MIT Sloan Management Review Strategy Forum, panelists responded to the statement: The diametric experiences of Disney and UEFA illustrate that firms should refrain from making political statements in support of particular stakeholders. Simcoe was one of the 7% of panelists who agreed that companies should refrain from making political statements. It has become an unwelcome yet unavoidable reality for some companies that they are under pressure to vote on activist shareholder proposals despite the risk of backlash from a multitude of stakeholders and observers.

Simcoe states, “The lesson is not to avoid things that might be unavoidable but to think ahead and develop a clear set of values to guide managers’ actions and statements in those circumstances.”

Exit mobile version