How Retailers Can Capitalize on the “Refund Effect”

Harvard Business Review

Dissatisfied angry woman, cheated client sit on sofa check received box, damaged or broken goods in parcel, talks to customers support, express complaints, looks annoyed. Bad delivery services concept

June 15, 2023

Harvard Business Review recently published an article co-authored by Carey Morewedge, Professor of Marketing, detailing his research that identifies ways retailers can capitalize on the “refund effect.”

In 2022, 16.5% of U.S. merchandise purchases were returned, costing retailers an estimated $816 billion. It is common for companies to attempt to prevent returns by providing more product information prior to a sale or by increasing shipping and transaction fees after a sale; the first attempt benefits the consumer, while the second is beneficial to the seller. In six experiments, Morewedge and his colleague found that cross-selling products during the product return process reduced revenue loss and benefited all parties.

Morewedge shares, “Research participants were more likely to spend money from a product refund than from a bonus, and even more likely to spend refunded money than unexpected income, like lottery winnings and tax refunds. We call this ‘the refund effect.’”

Therefore, cross-selling opportunities must occur during the returns process — before money is reissued to the customers’ original payment method.

 

Exit mobile version