May 31, 2022
MIT SMR Strategy Forum recently published insight featuring Timothy Simcoe, Professor of Strategy and Innovation, discussing how Starbucks is responding to the rise of unionization in the United States.
The CEO of Starbucks, Howard Shultz, remains firmly opposed to unionization, and as a result has fired more than 20 union leaders and introduced higher wages only at nonunionized stores. Starbucks’s strategy is indeed shortsighted, according to 40% of the panelists, who shared their thoughts on its strategy and how it would affect the company’s success. Despite not being in agreement with Starbucks’ decision, Timothy expressed skepticism regarding long-term predictions over the move. He did expect Starbucks to have sound reasoning for their decision, stating,
“I don’t think you can call it shortsighted, since they must have some expectations about how this move changes the behavior of workers who would otherwise unionize”
- [Journal of Financial Reporting] Corporate Sustainability: A Model Uncertainty Analysis of Materiality
- [Wall Street Journal] Taking a Company Private Brings New Risks, Responsibilities for Directors
- [Freakonomics, MD] Is Rainy Day Joint Pain All in Your Head?
- Expert Take: Measuring the Impact of Online Advertisements
- [Omaha World-Herald] Pandemic Forced Nebraskans to Innovate
- David ‘Big Papi’ Ortiz Visits Boston University’s Questrom School of Business
- [Forbes] Eli Lilly and Parexel Talk About the ROI of Practical AI
- [CBS News Boston] Expert Says Gas Price Gouging Nearly Impossible in Current Market
- [CBS News Boston] Drivers Change Habits as Gas Prices Rise in Mass.
- Is Starbucks’s Wage Increase a Shortsighted Strategy? What Experts Say